
We are a digital agency helping businesses develop immersive, engaging, and user-focused web, app, and software solutions.
2310 Mira Vista Ave
Montrose, CA 91020
2500+ reviews based on client feedback

What's Included?
ToggleSomething big just happened in online content, a clear sign of shifting tides. People Inc., a massive media company behind brands like Better Homes & Gardens and People magazine (formerly Dotdash Meredith), just announced a major deal with Microsoft. They’re letting Microsoft use their vast content library to train and power AI models. This isn’t a small agreement; it’s a huge partnership between a content heavyweight and a tech giant, happening at a very interesting time. For years, Google was the main highway for finding content. But now, with AI becoming smarter and more integrated, publishers are looking at new roads. This deal shows big players are ready to explore those new paths, with Microsoft positioning itself as a key partner. It feels like we’re watching the early stages of a big change in how we find and consume daily information.
Why this big move from People Inc.? The core reason cited is a drop in traffic from Google. For years, Google was the main gateway, sending countless visitors to websites. Publishers spent fortunes making content “Google-friendly” to rank high. But things are changing fast. Google is now using AI in its own search, often giving direct answers without users clicking through to a site. This, plus other shifts, means fewer clicks for many publishers. When your main traffic source shrinks, you must find new ways to connect with readers. This Microsoft deal isn’t just about more money; it’s a strategic step. It ensures People Inc.’s content stays visible, even as traditional search paths become less reliable. It’s a clear signal publishers aren’t solely relying on Google anymore. They’re actively seeking alternative routes to keep their valuable content in front of readers.
This deal is a huge win for Microsoft. They’ve poured resources into AI, especially with OpenAI and Copilot. But for AI to be truly smart, it needs vast amounts of high-quality, up-to-date information. That’s where People Inc.’s content comes in. Imagine asking Copilot about home cooking or celebrity news, getting answers directly informed by trusted sources like Allrecipes. This partnership helps Microsoft build a richer, more authoritative AI experience. It also strengthens their hand against Google. While Google grapples with balancing AI search and sending traffic, Microsoft is actively partnering with publishers. This could give Microsoft an edge, allowing them to offer a more comprehensive AI information service. It’s like Microsoft is saying, “We value quality content, and we’ll pay for it to make our AI better.” This approach could attract more users to Microsoft’s AI tools and give them a distinct advantage in the AI race.
This partnership really makes us think about how we’ll find online information in the future. For decades, “Googling it” was how we searched. You typed a question, got links, and clicked. But what if AI becomes the main way? Instead of links, you might get a concise answer generated by AI, informed by reliable sources like People Inc. publications. This could mean a big shift in user behavior. People might spend less time browsing websites and more time interacting directly with AI assistants. While convenient, this raises new questions for creators. How do they get credit? How do they build a brand when AI digests their content? This deal suggests publishers might need to license content to AI companies to ensure their work is included and valued, rather than just hoping to rank high on a traditional search page. It recognizes AI’s growing power as a direct source of answers.
For publishers like People Inc., this new AI landscape demands a delicate balance. On one hand, a licensing deal with Microsoft means they get paid for their valuable content. This helps ensure their work is economically viable in a world where AI might reduce direct website traffic. It’s crucial for sustainability. On the other hand, publishers also need to keep a direct connection with their audience. If AI answers become the norm, how do they keep readers coming to their sites, subscribing to their newsletters, and engaging with their unique brand? It’s not just about providing data for AI; it’s about staying relevant as a distinct entity. This deal might be one part of a larger strategy. Publishers might still create deeply engaging, exclusive content for direct visits, while also allowing AI to use their broader knowledge base. It’s a complex walk between getting paid for intellectual property and preserving a brand’s distinct appeal and community.
From my perspective, this deal isn’t just about these two companies; it’s a big signpost for the internet’s future. We’re moving from a “search and click” internet to one shaped by “ask and get an answer” from an AI. This has huge implications for everyone, from small bloggers to big media empires. It signals that content creators must think differently about how their work reaches people and how they get paid. It’s also a wake-up call for Google, showing other tech giants are actively pursuing publishers and reshaping the information ecosystem. This isn’t just a defensive play by a publisher losing Google traffic; it’s an offensive move by both sides to claim a stake in the emerging AI-first world. The value of human-created, high-quality content isn’t shrinking; instead, the ways it’s accessed and monetized are rapidly changing, and this deal is a prime example.
So, what does it all mean? The partnership between People Inc. and Microsoft is much more than a simple business agreement. It highlights a critical moment in the evolution of online content and how we interact with it. As AI tools become more sophisticated, traditional pathways for discovering information are being reimagined. Publishers are recognizing that their valuable content needs new avenues for distribution and monetization beyond conventional search engines. Microsoft, in turn, is aggressively building an AI ecosystem powered by authoritative human-generated content. This move suggests a future where the lines between content creation, distribution, and AI interpretation will become increasingly blurred. We are likely to see more of these kinds of deals as both tech companies and media publishers adapt to a world where AI acts as a powerful intermediary. It’s an exciting, if sometimes uncertain, period for anyone involved in online information. The way we find answers online is definitely changing.



Comments are closed